I’m not gonna put a pretty picture on this. James Loney put up a sub-.400 slugging percentage last season.
To put that into perspective, there have been 216 seasons of first basemen with more than 502 plate appearances between 2000 and 2009. The median slugging percentage is .500. Ryan Garko, despite being such a sub-par hitter for the position, has put up a better SLG% every year of his career than Loney put up last year. Only 16 first basemen since 2000 have had a sub-.400 slugging that (min. 502 AB), Loney and Aubrey Huff were the two to do it in 2009. Loney did it in the second-most plate appearances (651), with Darin Erstad’s horrendous .371 slugging in 663 plate appearances in 2005 beating him.
Yes, Loney was above average compared to the rest of the league last year But he was very bad given his position. In fact, he was the second-worst offensive 1B last year, only ahead of Huff. Even though he had an above-average on-base percentage for the league, 14 every day starting first basemen (out of 23) had a better on-base percentage. Even in the one thing that gives him offensive value, he’s below league average for the position.
His one saving grace, and the one reason why fans haven’t turned on him, is that he has potential. Also that the team is winning, but that’s a blanketing statement.
Meanwhile, the core of the Dodgers is getting older and more expensive and this may be their best opportunity for a serious run before the major 2012-2015 crash from the lack of prospects in the minors.
Fangraphs had a very good post about Loney. I don’t see what other people see in Loney’s swing. It’s very smooth, but it doesn’t look like he’s loading power. It looks like he’s deliberately not swinging for power most times. As the Fangraphs article points out, he’s actually very good at spraying the ball to the opposite field, but he’s not swinging for pull as much as he should be–that’s where his power is.
I always try to keep things in perspective. Big Klu didn’t come around immediately either. That’s how it works with prospects. It’s up to them to reach their potential.
Ted Kluszewski, however, had one above-average power year before his age 28 season. At first base, no less.
Now I’m not saying Loney will turn into Klu. Klu is a comparable, but he didn’t have Loney’s patience and patience is associated with a lot of good things in hitting. The problem is, if Loney’s best years are still ahead of him, or even three years ahead of him, can the Dodgers afford to wait for that?
First base is a premiere hitter’s position. Basically you want your best power hitters with no redeeming defensive qualities in these positions, by order: LF, 1B, RF, 3B, 2B, CF, C/SS. That’s kind of old school theory, but it’s correct. Maybe you’d rather have your worst fielder in RF because fewer balls go there (now there’s a cool study), but 1B is a great position because it doesn’t require much fielding and throwing.
The Dodgers right now are fortunate enough to have the best center fielder hitter in the game. Take his production and put it at 1B and it’s still valuable. They also have solid to above-average hitting (compared to other players in position) from third base, second base right field, left field and catcher.
Originally I thought maybe moving Ethier to first base and signing a free agent outfielder would be the best, since Ethier is such an awful outfielder. But Manny leaving next year means there’s already going to be one hole in the outfield and there is, right now, no outfielder in the minors that’s prepared to jump to the majors.
There’s a number of decent free agents available in the 2011 free agency pool at 1B and OF: Carl Crawford, Adam Dunn, Derrek Lee, Carlos Pena, Lyle Overbay and the potentially awesome return to Los Angeles of Jayson Werth. (There’s also the potential of the Cardinals not paying Pujols’ option, and same with the Astros and Berkman, but both ideas are laughable).
The team will also have a number of their players going through huge arbitration hearings over the next three years and will need to value their money properly. This goes for Kemp, Kershaw, Martin, Billingsley, Broxton and Sherrill, in addition to Loney.
Assuming the core of young talent becomes expensive, a cheap alternative wherever it can be found is necessary. So Loney, even though he’s not that great offensively, becomes remarkably valuable in dollar terms.
The OF market won’t be so strong that the Dodgers can pick up two valuable outfielders for reasonable prices. The only reasonable solution would be to sign both Crawford and Werth or maybe sign Dunn to play 1B and Crawford or Werth, with Ethier remaining in the outfield. In that latter one, you’re giving up A LOT on defense. And that’s assuming the bidding war for those players’ services doesn’t exceed the Dodgers’ budget.
Long story short, the drop in the level of production from
Ethier OF-Loney 1B-replacement OF
Ethier 1B-replacement OF-replacement OF
would be too great, and that’s made even worse if the Dodgers’ money woes continue into next year. The Dodgers would then have to trade Loney, and they’d have to give up more than they get in that. The only suitable replacement would have to be someone so great, he supercedes Loney and the replacement outfielder’s production–and that’s basically just Pujols.
Alternatively, every free agent 1B on the market has had serious injury issues or just isn’t that good. The only one I would consider a bigger gain than loss over Loney would be either Carlos Pena or Adam Dunn, though those two aren’t so great to warrant replacing Loney. (Dunn, fyi, is such a bad outfielder that he almost literally negates his offensive value).
So yeah. Maybe Loney’s not the best offensive 1B, but he’s the Dodgers’ 1B. Hopefully he develops into his full potential, but if he doesn’t, he’s still a valuable asset to the Dodgers.